144,116 members

Skip to content. | Skip to navigation

Sussex Dysphagia Network

Management of medicines and oral care for residents with dysphagia in care homes

Network navigation
 

Poll

Which term do you currently use most often in your reports?

Exploring terminology currently used by SLTs for people eating and drinking... More ›
Exploring terminology currently used by SLTs for people eating and drinking at risk of choking, aspiration, and related chest infections. Less ›
Feeding at risk
Risk feeding
Comfort feeding
Eating and drinking at risk
Eating and drinking at accepted risk
Eating and drinking at acknowledged risk
Other
View results ›
 
 

Management of medicines and oral care for residents with dysphagia in care homes

Article in the journal 'Geriatrics': "Pilot of a Charter to Improve Management of Medicines and Oral Care for Residents with Dysphagia in Care Homes"

@DharineeHansjee tweeted at 6:54 pm on Thu, Nov 15, 2018:

A valued opportunity to have been part of this advisory group on #dysphagia and #medicines Great to see the project work in print! #mouthcare #carehomes https://t.co/hpr8qVbWhl @PatientsAssoc @RCSLT @RCSLTResearch

Abstract

Research in care homes has demonstrated that medication management practices in patients with dysphagia and those receiving medicines covertly may be inappropriate, illegal, and potentially cause harm. This paper presents the results of a feasibility study piloting a resident and healthcare professional best practice charter to improve such practices in care home residents with dysphagia.

A charter was developed through a multi-professional expert panel, implemented in one care home, and then piloted in 22 homes in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland. A website was setup and developed iteratively to support the process. Care home staff and residents provided initial feedback on the implementation process and on perceived outcomes six months post implementation.

A total of 16 (88.9%) out of 18 respondents from nine homes for six months reported a positive response to the charter. More than 80% of responses regarding the implementation process, impact on staff confidence, and perceived usefulness of the charter were positive. Perceived effectiveness and usefulness could, however, be further improved especially the perceived effect on frequency of medication review, which is reliant on external stakeholder involvement. The charter and supporting website were well received with respondents believing that it was useful, staff showing more confidence, and residents having enhanced care. Approaches to enhancing the charter’s effectiveness were identified.