150,753 members

Skip to content. | Skip to navigation

Blog

Health boss on big salary blamed for knee-jerk reaction

 

Blog headlines

  • Reflections on a ‘new’ NHS and its impact on general practice
    10 September 2021

    This week’s blog we are sharing reflections by William Greenwood on the direction for the health service and potential impact on general practice.

  • When facilitation could turn into mediation
    3 September 2021

    Requests to attend a meeting, to help find a way forward, to help with planning, to redesign a care pathway, and numerous other reasons are not always what they seem. Sometimes you will be asked to facilitate, or just asked to attend. What then happens in the room may not be the meeting that you are expecting. Other situations, such as tensions between practices, departments or teams may give a more obvious sign that what is needed goes beyond just attending or facilitating a little.

  • Population Health Management?
    26 August 2021

    One of the frequently heard phrases of the moment is population health management – but what is it and does it work. The blog is from a longer article by Monica Duncan exploring the topic.

  • The future must be primary care
    19 August 2021

    The blog this week is by Professor David Colin-Thomé, chair of PCC.

  • Preparing for winter 2021/22
    13 August 2021

    One of the hottest days of the year saw people from practices, primary care networks (PCNs) and federations gather to start to think creatively about managing their winter pressures in this session hosted by PCC and the NHS Confederation PCN Network.

  • Building the collaboration
    5 August 2021

    Prior to COVID-19 primary care network (PCN) community pharmacy leads (representing a group of pharmacy contractors in their locality) were starting to contact the clinical director for their allocated PCN to discuss how pharmacy services could develop and adapt to help address community health needs.

  • Audit into action… with a pandemic thrown into the mix!
    29 July 2021

    A blog from the Clinical Leads for the National Audit of Care at the End of Life (NACEL).

  • GP partnership uses new video to highlight benefits of its merger-led transformation
    23 July 2021

    An East Cheshire-based GP practice, the Middlewood Partnership, which formally merged in order to successfully transform its clinical and business models, is sharing insights, via a new video, with colleagues across the health and social care sector.

  • Early evaluation of the Children and Young People’s Mental Health Trailblazer
    15 July 2021

    The Birmingham, RAND and Cambridge Evaluation Centre (BRACE) is funded by the National Institute for Health Research to conduct rapid evaluation of promising new services and innovations in health and social care. The BRACE Rapid Evaluation Centre and Policy Innovation and Evaluation Research Unit have published findings from the early evaluation of the Children and Young People’s Mental Health Trailblazer programme.

  • Learn from reflection
    8 July 2021

    We are sharing an article by Helen Northall, chief executive, PCC this week on learning from reflection.

  • Link of the week: National Thank You Day
    1 July 2021

    This week we are featuring National Thank You Day.

  • North East Essex integrated discharge single point of access - implementing the Coronavirus Act 2020 and Covid-19 hospital discharge service requirements
    24 June 2021

    The blog this week is from Frank Sims, chief executive of Anglian Community Enterprise and shares learning on collaboration and redesign to support hospital discharge.

  • Helping your patients making an informed choice: Medical or Surgical abortion?
    17 June 2021

    This week the blog has been submitted by MSI Reproductive Choices UK and is about supporting patients to make an informed choice based on NICE guidance.

  • The potential for case finding patients with cardiovascular disease in a dental setting
    10 June 2021

    The blog this week is by Wendy Crew, PCC adviser, considering the opportunity to case find patients with cardiovascular disease in a dental setting.

  • Using population health data to inform ARRS recruitment
    3 June 2021

    Funding for the additional role reimbursement scheme (ARRS) has increased nationally from £430m (2020-21) to £746m max. (2021-22) with an allocation available for each primary care network (PCN) depending on the size of the population it covers. Clinical commissioning groups (CCGs) draw down the funds but only as new roles are recruited within PCNs. PCNs are therefore being strongly encouraged to make use of their ARRS allocation to ensure people in their neighbourhoods benefit from the funding available.

  • SHAPE Atlas mapping tool
    27 May 2021

    As the themes of the NHS Long Term Plan start to become reality through plans for legislation to support integration, we need to work out where the best place is to deliver services.

  • Cancer Care Map
    20 May 2021

    The blog this week has been submitted by Robin Pritchard, co-director of Cancer Care Map. Cancer Care Map is a stand-alone, comprehensive, independent, free to use online directory of cancer support services in the UK providing verified and trusted information, regularly checked and updated and accessible to all.

  • Understanding and aligning link worker and community capacity building activity: A place-based approach in York and Wakefield
    13 May 2021

    The blog this week is by Sian Lockwood, chief executive officer of Community Catalysts.

  • Virtual group consultations and Why skip/send it to landfill?
    6 May 2021

    An article on group consultations that celebrates the patient perspective and experiences of receiving care this way from Alison Manson. Blog on reusing/recycling and saving money for a NHS Trust from Alex Ford.

  • Experience of Care Week
    30 April 2021

    This week we celebrate Experience of Care week which is an international initiative, which runs from 26 - 30 April, to celebrate the work that is happening across health and social care to keep improving experiences of care for patients, families, carers and staff. PCC governing body member Lesley Goodburn explains more below.

 
 
Thursday, 18 August 2011

Health boss on big salary blamed for knee-jerk reaction

“Health boss on £230k salary takes on new role” declares a headline this week in the East Anglian Daily Times, though it could have been any paper in any other week of the year.

Readers need go no further to know what to think. They are already pre-programmed for ironic contrast – bosses get further bloated pay awards while nurses and other frontline staff are forced to eat their children to survive.

The media know how to push our buttons and we react with gratifying predictability.

The NHS is a priceless national asset. People take to the streets to defend it against pillaging governments or raids by the new Vikings of the US healthcare industry, but are strangely resistant to the idea that NHS managers should be appropriately rewarded.

Doctors earn our undying gratitude – literally. It would be deeply churlish to quibble about what they get paid and we rarely do. 

Compare and contrast the managers of the system in which these acts of clinical heroism are performed. Surgeons save lives. Managers save money. Nurses make people feel better. Managers make them sick. 

It is a curious feature of our culture that we denigrate managers one minute and wonder why nothing works properly the next. We seem incapable of holding onto the thought that bad managers should be sacked without it bolting towards the conclusion that all managers should be sacked.

We’ve all seen the popular dramas in which the brave medicos pit their wits against hospital managers whose sadistic desire to under-resource is only matched by their compulsion to over-manage.

Of course the relationship between managers and clinical professionals is sometimes adversarial. That’s as it should be: it’s the tension between what the NHS would like to do and what it can afford to do.

A less obvious truth, skilfully disguised by casting good-looking, charismatic manager-villains in the medical soaps is that successful management is invisible and fundamentally dull. In the real world, managers are only interesting or newsworthy when they are bad or failing.

Paying six-figure salaries doesn’t automatically mean you get the best people for the job, but not paying them guarantees mediocrity. Ambitious clever people are not only attracted by the cash. They won’t be any less motivated without the prospect of financial reward; they will just be working somewhere else.

Working out how many nurses you would get for one chief executive is good sport but entirely facile. Increasing the numbers of troops on the frontline achieves nothing on its own. See the First World War for details. 

The public can be forgiven for believing the worst. People enjoy horror stories and they enjoy vilifying managers, particularly high-earning ones. Add a twist of incompetence and a pinch of mediocrity and you have the perfect tabloid cocktail.

Some of the same prejudices persist inside the NHS. Of course there are bad managers, but our determination to keep management in its place or run it down compounds the problem.

If you are determined to argue that managers are no good and to prove it by refusing to pay for good ones, you should not be surprised to find that you’re consistently right.

 

 
Tahirnaeemkhan
Tahirnaeemkhan says:
Aug 19, 2011 07:01 AM
I fully agree with this post. I believe the root cause of NHS problems is this phenomenon of 'Managerial Aristrocracy'. Over the years I have seen that managerial arm of NHS has expanded tremendously. To keep their post safe they create work for others especially medics and have an irresistible desire to dominate them despite the fact they have no knowledge of 'patient care'. Further whenever they start work they are always looking to create posts to have secretaries and Asst. Managers and then the vicious cycle starts.

NHS is a specialised organization which high expectations which can be effectively run by doctors/nurses only who know and can spot the clinical problems and provide solutions because they are the ones who are intimately associated with the care of their patients.

Another serious set back is that the managerial control of NHS became 'Peripheral' and frontline medical staff was excluded in the process of decision making. Only the Head of Department is summarily informed about the decision which have been taken and are ask to implement them. I believe a 'central' management system should be cultivated where the Managers gets into discussion with all consultants in the department and seek for appropriate directions. They then should work under their guidance to implement.

Another serious flaw I notice is that the managers create a lot of meetings to show that a lot of work is being done which is not only waste of time and resources butthey have little time to attend to the 'Bench - work place'. The remaining staff is left to struggle with the work while the Managers remain in a state of Nirvana in the meetings.
billymckee
billymckee says:
Aug 19, 2011 08:02 AM
Said manager jokes about his new 3 SHA cluster as having been dubbed "The Middle East". He will need the skills more usually associated with the UN Secretary General to sheppard this lot through the next few years. I wish him luck.
lynne
lynne says:
Aug 19, 2011 11:10 AM
William may be right about needing the skills associated with the UN secreatry general however he[the sec. general that is [rightly]] has a very large staff and does nothing alone. The divide between the haves and have little is vast [for proof see recent riots]. With the best will in the world it is hard to belive this person is worth 230K ...because after all he is not the UN Secretary general is he?
rejack
rejack says:
Aug 19, 2011 12:25 PM
Tahir i think you need to read the editors blog. Your reply is a stereotypical reaction from someone who clearly does not understand the principles of good management that are in place in many areas of the NHS. Clinical Divisional teams are made up of clinicians and managers who make joint decisions taking all views into account. Most Doctors and Nurses want to treat patients within a well managed framework, they want a say in how things are run but they do not want their time taken up in putting the necessary systems and processes in place.
simon@simondodds.com
simon@simondodds.com says:
Aug 20, 2011 01:31 PM
So called "bad managers" are like "bad doctors" - their decisions and actions result in adverse outcomes and the toxic effect spreads through an organsiation like cultural poison. The question I would like to pose is "Is this bad-outcome-generating-behaviour deliberate and therefore malicious?" My experience says "No" - the decisons and actions seem to be well intentioned. So this suggests that the way we are making decisions is flawed - and on investigating this hypothesis I discovered a possible reason. We are have not learned how to make better decisions - we appear to learn our healthcare management skills by osmosis - observing what we see,assuming it is "best practice", and then copying it. So if we are learning this way than what we will learn is how to create and maintain the status quo. In my role as a clinical director I see mostly good management, dedicated hard working managers, and well intentioned decisons and actions. What I do not see much of is outcoime improvement: higher quality AND lower costs. Lessons from outside healthcare prove that this elusive win-win outcome is possible - so I know there is an opportunity to improve both healthcare and healthcare management. I have discovered that there are tried-and-tested techiques and tools that we could learn to use - we were just never taught them at medical school or at management school. They do not feature on the MBA courses either which is a bit worrying. The approach is called "Improvement Science" and it is blend of people-factors and process-factors: heart and mind. The process-factor stuff is the quickest and easiest to learn and apply - and delivers improvements in effectiveness and efficiency almost immediately and at no cost. So, we can side-step the whole debate about good-versus-bad managers and how much-or-not they are paid and instead focus on developing better and better managers. Curious? If so have a look at the Improvement Science forum at www.saasoft.com/blog and draw your own conclusions.